Let’s Talk About Education Tuesday: Episode 11

Ah, July. The month of significant envelopes. I think the College Board and the International Baccalaureate Organization conspired to knock their pupils flat with as many test scores as they could possibly send out at once. Luckily, I received scores that met or exceeded my (sane) expectations for the subjects they corresponded to, and seeing exam results is reinforcing my understanding of the IB curriculum as well as my own learning style.

As much as my classmates and I complain about and belittle it, IB is wonderful in unexpected ways: the internal assessment we did for math gave me the opportunity to lie awake at night machinating over the derivation of a theoretical function, followed by unprecedented euphoria over sudden understanding and the fun of explaining it in the paper itself. Realizing that the problem’s title, “Lacsap’s Fractions,” was a play on Pascal’s Triangle was a priceless way of humanizing IB teachers and graders. And even though chemistry isn’t my best subject, I was astoundingly fascinated by the Paper 3 material about its real-life applications in pharmaceuticals and nanotechnology.

Sincerely grateful for all that, but still annoyed with their categorization. In the IB’s required epistemology course, Theory of Knowledge, the main anchors of discussion are the four Ways of Knowing (emotion, language, perception, and reason) and the six Areas of Knowledge (art, ethics, history, human sciences, natural sciences, and mathematics). I don’t think it’s possible to accurately divide all knowledge into any system of categorization, so the IBO’s flawed taxonomy is forgivable. But what it could support much more effectively is the intersection between all of the Areas of Knowledge. A segment of science internal assessments, the Group 4 project is admirable because it requires collaboration between students in physics, biology, and chemistry, but even that’s not as creatively interdisciplinary as it could be. 

Our very first ToK assignment was to label ourselves with a Way of Knowing and an Area of Knowledge. I hated it. Not only did I find it impossible to prioritize the subjects I like, but I realized that the specific topics I fervently, passionately love thinking and talking about don’t fall into any of those categories but bridge two or more of them. I wrote an extra page in protest of the assignment’s premise in which I staunchly declared myself a “fault-liner” (though, of course, I chose ethics and emotion because I wanted points for completion), and I believe that interaction between fields is necessary for progress and general awesomeness. Think about it: human scientists translate data provided by artists and historians. Natural scientists make sense of data given by mathematicians. Ethicists look at the whole mess and try to surmise a beneficial course of action. It’s all mutually symbiotic.

Overlap also makes learning much more fun and complete. It’s why historical background should precede the analysis of a novel in literature classes, and why primary document analysis is such an important skill in history classes. Learning about Soviet Russia from a textbook gives you a perspective from the outside looking in. Reading The Unbearable Lightness of Being by Milan Kundera and Rock ‘n’ Roll by Tom Stoppard gets you right into the nitty gritty of life as a Czech influenced by the Soviet regime. Great science writers, too, know how to draw together chronicles of discovery to make complicated information understandable and even emotional: try Mary Roach’s Spook or Deborah Blum’s The Poisoner’s Handbook.

The point of all this is that no event or fact stands independent of any field (challenge me at the six degrees of art history, I dare you), and the moment of understanding a concept in one field with background knowledge from a different one is sublime. So maybe our education system draws borders between disciplines too fiercely, too dark. But you can still duck beneath the safety rope and dangle your feet into the canyon. It’s a cool place to be.


2 thoughts on “Let’s Talk About Education Tuesday: Episode 11

  1. I’m writing on an iPad so I’ll have to be brief. Plus, iPads and iPhones think they are soo smart with their auto correct so if I have weird typos or melded words, blame the iPad.

    But anyways, great post yet again! And also, yes, it was strangely peculiar that I got my AP and IB scores on the same day. It was like two moments of hyperventilating stuck in a space of 12 hours. How joyful… No seriously, I started breathing erratically fifteen minutes before IB scores were posted and when I saw that AP envelope.

    But I have to admit, if I have to choose between IB and AP for the knowledge I get out, I’d choose IB all the way. AP classes feel like you’re being taught to the test and though examinations are important for IB, the integration of internal assessments allow you to also show depth and application in knowledge. I got to study so much about the French culture with IB and I had more fun with the exam than with my AP one. But it is rather annoying how they categorize and define things. No one topic can be neatly placed in a subject. Like chemistry is a science but we forget there are lab reports involved and charts too. Doesn’t that mean art and English is also key? The world is a broad spectrum that can not be neatly placed in labelled boxes, but I can’t begrudge IB either. It tries pretty hard to give students a good and provoking education. So cheers for that!

    P.S.: how has your summer been? And congrats on doing well with your scores (not that I wouldn’t expect it from you).

    • I think we have very different definitions of brief 😉

      I’m not at all surprised that you did well on your tests, you studious fiend! And I love that you’ve pointed out the overlap not just in knowledge but in skill–that one’s perhaps more important, and something that certain of our classmates could stand to utilize better…

      Love the insight.

      P.S. It’s going well, and you? Congrats to you, too, lovely lady! We should get together soon!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s